Stories from the Washington Post and Associated Press remind us this morning that union officials have finally found government they don’t want to enlarge — at least when it’s controlled by someone they didn’t help elect. Union officials have been attacking the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Department of Labor Office of Labor-Management Standards (OLMS) for allegedly undertaking an anti-union campaign. Now Big Labor’s PR machine is becoming more narrow and sophisticated and directing its attacks more carefully at what they call “Bush’s” labor board.
Of course, the OLMS is protecting union members and the NLRB is protecting all employees and the board is at a point in the normal give-and-take of labor law. From the Post:
But unions continue to assail the NLRB. According to the AP, Robert Battista, the board’s head, isn’t taking the attacks lying down:
Amen.
Finally, we note this quote from Democrat-favored board member Wilma Liebman: “Today, fewer workers have fewer rights and weaker remedies under the National Labor Relations Act.” We’re pretty sure she didn’t mean what she actually said, though we’ll certainly cheers to the board making sure that fewer workers enjoy fewer rights.
Come to think of it, maybe a good way to make sure more employees have more rights is for union bosses and their political allies to stop attacking the labor board and end their campaign to steal secret ballots from working Americans. But we won’t be holding our breath.